The rise of Agile program management came as industries faced increasing demands for adaptability. This methodology revolutionized program management by introducing an iterative approach that values flexibility, whereas traditional program management offers a step-by-step structure for project guidance. There are many factors to consider when selecting the right Program Management Office (PMO) model as they are not a one-size-fits-all solution. These factors can include the scope of work, project complexity, and adaptability to change.
Agile program management focuses on collaboration, flexibility within a team, and external feedback for success. By having continuous feedback and collaborative efforts, obstacles can be resolved throughout every stage of the project. The Agile method has four essential values to increase project efficiency:
Along with these values, there are two distinct frameworks Agile uses, Scrum and Kanban. They equally stress the importance of customer satisfaction and are recognized for promoting efficient decision-making and time management.
Traditional program management, also known as the Waterfall method, is an established methodology for managing projects sequentially with well-defined stages and predetermined requirements. This PMO method is more structured and is not meant to deviate from the initial project scope. The sequential phases of traditional program management are:
Other differences include flexibility, documentation practices, and communication styles.
Agile benefits the client in several substantial ways from collaborative participation and higher product quality to secure risk management.
The client is involved in the project initiative from the beginning, alongside other non-traditional project members, such as those from various departments or external consultants. With this additional input, agile focused organizations can shift priorities quickly as a direct response to the needs of the client. Cross-functional teamwork and frequent communication fosters a strong culture of collaboration, leveraging diverse perspectives, driving innovation, and creative problem-solving.
The proactive approach of continuous enhancement not only leads to a higher standard of quality in the final product and also ensures any abnormalities from the desired outcome are promptly addressed. Integrating quality assurance measures into every phase of development not only enhances the result but also instills a sense of pride and ownership among team members, resulting in a more robust and reliable final product.
Dividing projects into smaller, more manageable segments allows teams to regularly review and assess progress, enabling prompt adjustments when issues arise. This approach to risk management significantly decreases the chances of major project setbacks or failures, ensuring they are mitigated before they escalate into significant obstacles. This leads to a more resilient project and provides stakeholders with a higher level of confidence in the project’s ultimate success.
The step-by-step structure of the traditional Waterfall methodology also benefits the client with clarified expectations and roles, in-depth documentation, and accountability and control measures.
Roles and responsibilities are meticulously set in the planning phase, ensuring each team member understands their specific duties and contributions, leaving little room for ambiguity. This clarity significantly simplifies the estimation of costs, schedules, and required resources. Clear expectations also provide a transparent view to team members and stakeholders, ensuring everyone understands their roles at each project phase.
Every step in the traditional method requires clear documentation. This documentation serves as a tangible record of project scope, objectives, and strategies, ensuring all management or other stakeholders remain informed throughout the duration of the project. This level of detail provides a clear and structured roadmap for the entire team and instills confidence in stakeholders, assuring them the project is being executed with precision and care.
Project managers ensure their team is held accountable for reaching milestones and remaining within set timeframes and budgets by offering guidance, support, and resources when needed. The project manager approves any change request after reviewing the potential impact. This level of control is especially valuable in industries or projects where adhering to strict guidelines is crucial. Traditional program management provides a level of stability and predictability that can be crucial in managing complex and high-risk projects.
When it comes to these two methodologies, there is not a one-size-fits-all approach. The biggest factors in choosing are usually the size of the company, how extensive the scope of work is, and the risk level. Larger companies or initiatives typically take the traditional route. Agile is typically better suited for small to medium-scale organizations or projects. For high-risk projects, the Agile framework is more beneficial as issues can be addressed and resolved within a shorter timeframe. By reviewing these factors, organizations can make informed decisions on aligning their chosen methodology with the specific needs and dynamics of their projects.
To learn more about our GovRAMP PMO experience, contact us today.